Does Sims ever get less annoyingly sceptical?

I just started this podcast a few days ago, and I am immensely enjoying it. Sims is a good character and I have heard that after a while, the stories start to get more connected, and we get to know more about the staff at the institute.

I was just wondering about the one thing that kind of annoys me so far about Jonathan Sims. Does he ever get less skeptical about things? And I don't mean about the stories that are like, hard to prove. I can understand being skeptical about those. But. This man is a main archivist of supernatural events, and he brushes off the "clients" like he never heard of extraordinary stuff turning out to be true in his life.

For example, there was this case with the spider, titled Arachnophobia. Sims basically goes : "Oh yeah, this guy was super crazy for sure. He thinks spider ghosts are real lol. Although we did find out that he died shortly after, with hundreds of spiderwebs around him. I'm sure it was nothing tho, crazy guy huh."

There are a bunch of other cases where there is clearly proof of supernatural, and he still goes about how he thinks the client was just psychotic or crazy or something. He knows the supernatural stuff is real, and he still says to the woman whose fiancée died that he thinks she's nuts, even before doing any investigating. All this is just kind of getting on my nerves. Not enough to stop listening, but still. Does he ever start being more... I guess, open to stuff? I think the last three episodes I listened to were are about stuff that where at least partly proved and he still maintains that he doesn't believe the people who reported the incidents the slightest.